agentplat▸control runs deployments agents metering + agent
← runs

run_0ad30c8b3ae5a65c

AWAITING_APPROVAL retrigger →
jira-triage v1 · jira-triage-k8s · owner ingest:jira-new-ticket (api) · via jira-new-ticket · cloud-engineering

input

{
  "request": "Triage Jira ticket MZCLD-3808: Setup JBI integration for Bugzilla intake",
  "references": [
    "https://mozilla-hub.atlassian.net/browse/MZCLD-3808"
  ],
  "sourceContext": {
    "issue": "MZCLD-3808"
  }
}

summary

MZCLD-3808 is a Backlog-status ticket requesting setup of JBI (Jira-Bugzilla Integration) to sync Bugzilla tickets into Jira for intake purposes. The ticket has no comments and its description flags an open, blocking decision: which Jira project (e.g., a GHE project vs. a GITHUB project) should receive the synced tickets. No runbook or Confluence design doc is linked in the ticket, so no additional architectural context could be pulled. The ticket is not yet actionable as an engineering task until the target project is decided, and lacks other typical setup details (Bugzilla product/component filters, sync direction, field mappings, owner/assignee).

findings

  • Ticket is in Backlog with zero comments, indicating no triage or scoping discussion has happened yet.
  • The description explicitly states the work is blocked on an undecided prerequisite: which Jira project JBI should sync Bugzilla tickets into.
  • No runbook or Confluence design document is linked in the ticket description or comments, so implementation details (e.g., which Bugzilla products/components to sync, field mappings, sync direction, whitelist/allowlist config) are undefined.
  • Given JBI is Mozilla's actively maintained Bugzilla<->Jira integration service, this ticket likely needs to reference the JBI service's existing project-mapping configuration/runbook (typically maintained in the jbi repo or a Confluence space) once the target project is chosen, but that reference is missing here.

proposed actions

jira.comment.postrisk low - informational triage comment only, no config changes; simply requests clarification and proposes next steps before implementation begins.
MZCLD-3808
Triage note: This ticket is currently blocked on a decision -- which Jira project should receive Bugzilla-synced tickets (a 'GHE' project vs. a 'GITHUB' project)? Before this can move out of Backlog, we need:

1. A decision on the target Jira project (project key) for the synced Bugzilla tickets, ideally made with input from the requesting team on why GHE vs GITHUB naming/ownership makes sense.
2. Scope details for the JBI (Jira-Bugzilla Integration) config: which Bugzilla product(s)/component(s) should be included, sync direction (one-way Bugzilla->Jira, or bidirectional), and field mappings (status, priority, assignee, etc.).
3. A link to (or creation of) the JBI configuration runbook/design doc so implementers have a reference for how project mappings are added to the JBI service.

Recommend keeping this in Backlog and adding a blocking/dependency link to a follow-up spike or decision ticket to resolve #1, then re-scoping this ticket once the target project is confirmed. Please tag the requester or Bugzilla intake owner to confirm the project choice.

tool calls

[
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3808"
    },
    "result": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3808",
      "summary": "Setup JBI integration for Bugzilla intake",
      "status": "Backlog",
      "description_text": "We should configure JBI to sync tickets to Jira. Once we figure out which Jira project this stuff should live in. A  GHE  Jira project?  GITHUB  Jira project?",
      "comment_count": 0,
      "comments": []
    }
  }
]

usage

{
  "model": "claude-sonnet-5",
  "input_tokens": 3072,
  "output_tokens": 1429,
  "estimated_cost_usd": 0.030650999999999998
}

approvals

[]

log

launched k8s job run-run-0ad30c8b3ae5a65c in ns/mzcld-demo-dev image=us-docker.pkg.dev/moz-fx-mzcld-demo-prod/mzcld-demo-prod/agentplat:latest
runner started
live reasoning model=claude-sonnet-5
awaiting approval for 1 action(s)