agentplat▸control runs deployments agents metering + agent
← runs

run_216d08834aeb5be3

AWAITING_APPROVAL retrigger →
jira-triage v1 · jira-triage-k8s · owner ingest:jira-new-ticket (api) · via jira-new-ticket · cloud-engineering

input

{
  "request": "Triage Jira ticket MZCLD-3730: FinOps Q4 2026: cost visibility, attribution, and Q3 carry-in (placeholder \u2014 scope TBD)",
  "references": [
    "https://mozilla-hub.atlassian.net/browse/MZCLD-3730"
  ],
  "sourceContext": {
    "issue": "MZCLD-3730"
  }
}

summary

MZCLD-3730 is an intentional placeholder epic reserving the Q4 2026 slot on the CE/FinOps roadmap while scope is still undefined. It is currently in Backlog with no comments. The ticket itself documents that Q4 scope is not yet written into the FinOps roadmap doc, that Q3 epics likely to carry into Q4 are attached via "relates to" links, and that two Q3 commitments (Pigment integration; consumption emails to engineering-manager workgroups) lack epics of their own. The ticket's "Done when" criteria are clear and actionable, but no progress indicators (comments, linked epic updates) exist yet. Related tickets (INFOKR-48, MZCLD-955) could not be read due to access policy restricting reads to the ticket named in this run's subject.

findings

  • none

proposed actions

jira.comment.postrisk low — informational/triage comment only, no ticket fields changed, subject to human approval before posting
MZCLD-3730
Triage note: This is confirmed as an intentional Q4 2026 placeholder epic (Backlog, no scope defined yet, no comments to date). Recommend the following next steps before Q4 planning locks in:

1. James Francis: fill in the Q4 tab of the FinOps roadmap doc (currently empty) with at least a first-pass scope list.
2. Triage each linked 'relates to' Q3 epic — for each, decide: re-Fix-Version to 2026-Q4, close as done, or drop from Q4 scope.
3. Create dedicated epics for the two known likely carry-ins with no epic yet: (a) Pigment integration, and (b) consumption emails to engineering-manager workgroups — link them here and to theme MZCLD-955.
4. Confirm with INFOKR-48 whether Q4 is still 'TBD' or has since been scoped at the org level, since that record is the source of truth referenced by this placeholder.
5. Once real epics exist (or if none materialize), either close this placeholder in favor of the new epics, or rewrite it with its own acceptance criteria and T-shirt size per the 'Done when' text already on the ticket.

No blocking issues found; this ticket is functioning as intended as a scope-reservation placeholder, but it has had no activity yet and should get an owner check-in before Q4 planning begins.

tool calls

[
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3730"
    },
    "result": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3730",
      "summary": "FinOps Q4 2026: cost visibility, attribution, and Q3 carry-in (placeholder \u2014 scope TBD)",
      "status": "Backlog",
      "description_text": "Owner:  James Francis.  Collaborators:  Jason Thomas, Steven Prokopienko Placeholder.  Q4 2026 FinOps scope is not defined yet \u2014 the Q4 tab of the FinOps roadmap doc is empty and INFOKR-48 records Q4 as \"TBD\". This epic reserves the Q4 slot on the 2026 CE roadmap and collects the Q3 work that may carry in, so nothing is lost at the quarter boundary. Q3 epics that may spill into Q4 are attached as  relates to  links (see Linked issues). The two Q3 commitments with no epic yet \u2014 Pigment integration and consumption emails to engineering-manager workgroups \u2014 are the likeliest Q4 carry-ins and need epics of their own once scoped. Expect surprises: Q4 will also pick up work that does not exist in the Q3 plan at all. Done when:  Q4 scope is written into the FinOps roadmap doc Q4 tab, the carry-in set is triaged (each linked epic either re-Fix-Versioned to 2026-Q4, closed, or dropped), and this placeholder is either replaced by real scoped epics or rewritten with its own acceptance criteria and T-shirt size. Part of theme:  MZCLD-955 (FinOps: Cloud Cost Visibility FY26) Roadmap doc:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RUd8mTJp-XgjXeoqbQ-9CAj6w98y6mN8ZEOQa3wbSA0/edit?tab=t.3mp6r9fl1c3v",
      "comment_count": 0,
      "comments": []
    }
  },
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "INFOKR-48"
    },
    "result": {
      "error": "read blocked by policy: resource not in run subject",
      "args": {
        "key": "INFOKR-48"
      }
    },
    "blocked": true
  },
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-955"
    },
    "result": {
      "error": "read blocked by policy: resource not in run subject",
      "args": {
        "key": "MZCLD-955"
      }
    },
    "blocked": true
  }
]

usage

{
  "model": "claude-sonnet-5",
  "input_tokens": 6155,
  "output_tokens": 2106,
  "estimated_cost_usd": 0.050055
}

approvals

[]

log

launched k8s job run-run-216d08834aeb5be3 in ns/mzcld-demo-dev image=us-docker.pkg.dev/moz-fx-mzcld-demo-prod/mzcld-demo-prod/agentplat:latest
runner started
live reasoning model=claude-sonnet-5
POLICY: blocked read jira.issue.read args={'key': 'INFOKR-48'} not in run subject
POLICY: blocked read jira.issue.read args={'key': 'MZCLD-955'} not in run subject
awaiting approval for 1 action(s)