agentplat▸control runs deployments agents metering + agent
← runs

run_63abbdffc7c5038c

SUCCEEDED retrigger →
jira-triage v1 · jira-triage-k8s · owner ingest:jira-new-ticket (api) · via jira-new-ticket · cloud-engineering

input

{
  "request": "Triage Jira ticket MZCLD-3699: Triage the full list of ISO 27001 audit findings for cloud-side remediation",
  "references": [
    "https://mozilla-hub.atlassian.net/browse/MZCLD-3699"
  ],
  "sourceContext": {
    "issue": "MZCLD-3699"
  }
}

summary

MZCLD-3699 is a coordination/meta-ticket asking Cloud Engineering to walk through all 29 ISO 27001:2022 audit findings (recorded in an external Google Sheet) and explicitly mark each as cloud-relevant or not, assigning owner/target date only where relevant, and spinning off a tracked engineering ticket only when real remediation work is warranted. The ticket itself does not require new engineering work beyond the triage decision-making — three cloud-touching findings have already been identified and split into their own tickets (MZCLD-3697, MZCLD-3696, MZCLD-3698). The ticket is currently sitting untouched in Backlog with no comments, so it's unclear whether the full 29-item review has actually been performed or just the three obvious ones flagged in the description.

findings

  • Ticket is a triage/bookkeeping task, not itself a remediation task: the source of truth for all 29 findings is an external Google Sheet, and this ticket's job is to record a cloud-relevant/not-relevant decision for each finding plus spin off engineering tickets only where warranted.
  • Three cloud-touching findings have already been pre-identified in the ticket description and broken out into their own tracked tickets, with severity and current status noted.
  • No visible progress has been recorded on this triage ticket: it remains in Backlog status with zero comments, despite the description already containing enough detail to suggest some analysis has happened informally (the three known findings).
  • The remaining 26 of 29 findings (everything other than #19, #22, #29) have not been explicitly triaged as cloud-relevant or not within the ticket itself — the description states most are owned by GRC, Legal, or People but does not enumerate which of the 26 were reviewed and cleared as non-cloud.
  • This session could not independently verify the source spreadsheet or the current state of the three linked sub-tickets due to tool/access constraints: the findings sheet is a Google Sheet (outside the confluence_page_read tool's scope) and reads of MZCLD-3697/3696/3698 were blocked by policy as out of scope for this run.

proposed actions

none

tool calls

[
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3699"
    },
    "result": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3699",
      "summary": "Triage the full list of ISO 27001 audit findings for cloud-side remediation",
      "status": "Backlog",
      "description_text": "Background The auditor produced 29 findings against ISO 27001:2022, tracked in the findings spreadsheet linked below. That sheet is the single source of record for the full list \u2014 this ticket does not attempt to reproduce it in Jira. Most findings are owned by GRC, Legal, or People; several are cloud-relevant and one (#29, Annex 8.11 Data masking) names CloudEng directly. Goal Walk the complete list of 29 findings and decide cloud-relevant or not for each, so Cloud Engineering's coverage is explicit rather than assumed. Cloud-relevant findings get an owner and a target date. Create a separate Jira ticket only where the remediation warrants tracked engineering work \u2014 we are deliberately not making a ticket per finding. Known cloud-touching findings #19 (Annex 5.18, Access rights) \u2014 no documented user access review schedule. High / Major. Tracked in MZCLD-3697. #22 (Annex 5.29, Information security during disruption) \u2014 BCP and DR testing frequency not defined. Low / Minor. Tracked in MZCLD-3696. #29 (Annex 8.11, Data masking) \u2014 no data masking policy or evidence of controls. High / Major, CloudEng named as owner. Tracked in MZCLD-3698. Findings source (full list of all 29) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Nohasbf1LpY9VsjJjy5Dx40cYOSLIUPP32-UEVOIxik/edit?gid=0#gid=0",
      "comment_count": 0,
      "comments": []
    }
  },
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3697"
    },
    "result": {
      "error": "read blocked by policy: resource not in run subject",
      "args": {
        "key": "MZCLD-3697"
      }
    },
    "blocked": true
  },
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3696"
    },
    "result": {
      "error": "read blocked by policy: resource not in run subject",
      "args": {
        "key": "MZCLD-3696"
      }
    },
    "blocked": true
  },
  {
    "capability": "jira.issue.read",
    "args": {
      "key": "MZCLD-3698"
    },
    "result": {
      "error": "read blocked by policy: resource not in run subject",
      "args": {
        "key": "MZCLD-3698"
      }
    },
    "blocked": true
  }
]

usage

{
  "model": "claude-sonnet-5",
  "input_tokens": 6153,
  "output_tokens": 2363,
  "estimated_cost_usd": 0.05390400000000001
}

approvals

[]

log

launched k8s job run-run-63abbdffc7c5038c in ns/mzcld-demo-dev image=us-docker.pkg.dev/moz-fx-mzcld-demo-prod/mzcld-demo-prod/agentplat:latest
runner started
live reasoning model=claude-sonnet-5
POLICY: blocked read jira.issue.read args={'key': 'MZCLD-3697'} not in run subject
POLICY: blocked read jira.issue.read args={'key': 'MZCLD-3696'} not in run subject
POLICY: blocked read jira.issue.read args={'key': 'MZCLD-3698'} not in run subject